<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Identity Theft Rates Among Top Banks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.impactlab.com/2008/03/04/identity-theft-rates-among-top-banks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.impactlab.com/2008/03/04/identity-theft-rates-among-top-banks/</link>
	<description>A laboratory of the future human experience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:47:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Murray</title>
		<link>http://www.impactlab.com/2008/03/04/identity-theft-rates-among-top-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-1137</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 21:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impactlab.com/2008/03/04/identity-theft-rates-among-top-banks/#comment-1137</guid>
		<description>Capitalization errors and misuse of &quot;i.e.&quot; aside, I&#039;m disturbed by the report. 

Being consumer complaints, you have produced a tally of good old fraud, from fishing credit card numbers out of the garbage to phishing scams, yet ended up spinning the numbers into a measure of the safety of the institution.

If John Doe gets a phishing scam e-mail appearing to be from Bank of America and falls for it, is it NOT the bank&#039;s fault.

If phishers send out millions of e-mails to Bank of America customers and one hundred to Macy&#039;s, it&#039;s not Bank of America&#039;s fault.

If Macy&#039;s customers happen to be more web savvy than Bank of America&#039;s customers, it is not Bank of America&#039;s fault.

If Bank of America has orders of magnitude more customers than another institution, and they have a correspondingly higher fraud count, it&#039;s not their fault. All things even, it&#039;s to be expected.

Finally, regarding &quot;If data were available on this crime, consumers could choose safer institutions....&quot;  I saw no evidence whatsoever that Bank of America is any less safe than any other institution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Capitalization errors and misuse of &#8220;i.e.&#8221; aside, I&#8217;m disturbed by the report. </p>
<p>Being consumer complaints, you have produced a tally of good old fraud, from fishing credit card numbers out of the garbage to phishing scams, yet ended up spinning the numbers into a measure of the safety of the institution.</p>
<p>If John Doe gets a phishing scam e-mail appearing to be from Bank of America and falls for it, is it NOT the bank&#8217;s fault.</p>
<p>If phishers send out millions of e-mails to Bank of America customers and one hundred to Macy&#8217;s, it&#8217;s not Bank of America&#8217;s fault.</p>
<p>If Macy&#8217;s customers happen to be more web savvy than Bank of America&#8217;s customers, it is not Bank of America&#8217;s fault.</p>
<p>If Bank of America has orders of magnitude more customers than another institution, and they have a correspondingly higher fraud count, it&#8217;s not their fault. All things even, it&#8217;s to be expected.</p>
<p>Finally, regarding &#8220;If data were available on this crime, consumers could choose safer institutions&#8230;.&#8221;  I saw no evidence whatsoever that Bank of America is any less safe than any other institution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
