<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reactable May Be The Future Of Music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.impactlab.com/2009/03/17/reactable-may-be-the-future-of-music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.impactlab.com/2009/03/17/reactable-may-be-the-future-of-music/</link>
	<description>A laboratory of the future human experience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:47:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ander</title>
		<link>http://www.impactlab.com/2009/03/17/reactable-may-be-the-future-of-music/comment-page-1/#comment-13115</link>
		<dc:creator>ander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impactlab.com/2009/03/17/reactable-may-be-the-future-of-music/#comment-13115</guid>
		<description>Very pretty, but apparently just another way to produce dance loops. How can we be so technologically advanced and yet so culturally impoverished? How much longer will eye candy be considered an acceptable substitute for musical substance and subtlety?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very pretty, but apparently just another way to produce dance loops. How can we be so technologically advanced and yet so culturally impoverished? How much longer will eye candy be considered an acceptable substitute for musical substance and subtlety?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
