Adam Penenberg:
We’ve been having a spirited discussion in the journalism department at New York University. With newspapers hemorrhaging readers and people migrating to the web for their daily news fix, should we consider changing the way we teach journalism?

For as far back as anyone can remember, New York University has used introductory courses to drill students on the basics: “ledes,” “nut grafs,” the “inverted pyramid” and the “five Ws” ­- who, what, where, when, why (and No. 6: how). But at a time when the vast majority of our students who enter the job market will never work for a newspaper, does it make sense to stick with tradition?

Should we raze our curriculum to the ground and start over, perhaps, and look to the web for inspiration? Could it be beneficial to jettison “objectivity” and “balance” in favor of transparent bias, much like bloggers (and online columnists) do? Would it be wise to encourage our students to exchange fact-based narrative for edgy commentary and digital trash talk? And if we were to banish the inverted pyramid to the scrapheap of history, what could we replace it with?

Or do the basics of newspaper writing and reporting offer students the necessary foundation for them to succeed in any medium, whether it be print, online, broadcast, wire service, blogs or any other information-distribution system that may be coming down the pike?

Of course, we aren’t the only ones mulling journalism’s future. Far from the pedagogical front, media monarch Rupert Murdoch warned the American Society of Newspaper Editors that many in the industry have become “remarkably, unaccountably, complacent.”

In an April 13 speech about the role of newspapers in the modern age, Murdoch cited a Carnegie study that found young Americans between 18 and 34 prefer to get their news from the web, and that their favored destinations were internet portals. Forty-four percent of respondents claimed to use a portal at least once a day for news, compared to 19 percent who didn’t mind getting inky hands from a newspaper.

What Murdoch found particularly disturbing was younger readers’ attitude toward newspapers: “Only 9 percent describe us as trustworthy, a scant 8 percent find us useful, and only 4 percent of respondents think we’re entertaining. Among major news sources, our beloved newspaper is the least likely to be the preferred choice for local, national or international news going forward.”

Then again, perhaps Murdoch was thinking of the way many Americans view the decidedly unhip New York Post, a tabloid he owns.

Yes, it’s true that newspapers are steadily losing readers and that younger people will undoubtedly choose the web. Ultimately, the printed word will die off. Not tomorrow or the next day, but in the coming decades. It’s inevitable since it will be more cost-effective (not to mention better for the environment) to distribute news over the web and via cell phones and PDAs than by printing it on paper and relying on trucks to deliver it to newsstands and subscribers’ doorsteps.

More here.