Divorce lawyers find a new friend in social media.
Forgot to de-friend your wife on Facebook while posting vacation shots of your mistress? Her divorce lawyer will be thrilled.
Oversharing on social networks has led to an overabundance of evidence in divorce cases. The American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers says 81% of its members have used or faced evidence plucked from Facebook, MySpace, Twitter and other social networking sites, including YouTube and LinkedIn, over the last five years.
“Oh, I’ve had some fun ones,” said Linda Lea Viken, president-elect of the 1,600-member group. “It’s very, very common in my new cases,” she adds.
Facebook is the unrivaled leader for turning virtual reality into real-life divorce drama, Viken said. Sixty-six per cent of the lawyers surveyed cited Facebook foibles as the source of online evidence, she said. MySpace followed with 15%, followed by Twitter at 5%.
About one in five adults uses Facebook for flirting, according to a 2008 report by the Pew Internet and American Life Project. But it’s not just kissy pix with the manstress or mistress that show up as evidence.
Think of Dad forcing son to de-friend mom, bolstering her alienation of affection claim against him.
Divorce attorneys spoke in broad terms about some of the goofs they’ve encountered:
— Husband goes on Match.com and declares his single, childless status while seeking primary custody of said nonexistent children.
— Mom denies in court that she smokes marijuana but posts partying, pot-smoking photos of herself on Facebook.
Via Times of India