By Futurist Thomas Frey
The Seductive Logic of Having a Conversation with Abstract Concepts
Can you talk to conspiracy theories? To economic recessions? To your own lack of motivation? What about contrails, unsolved crimes, the magnetosphere, or your personal biases?
The short answer: yes, if you’re willing to accept that you’re not actually talking to these things—you’re talking to AI models sophisticated enough to simulate their behavior, explain their mechanisms, and respond as if they were entities with agency.
The longer answer is more unsettling: we’re going to do this whether it’s philosophically coherent or not, because conversational interfaces are irresistibly compelling. And the results will range from genuinely helpful to dangerously misleading depending on what we’re trying to give voice to and why.
The concept of “talking to the defect”—using AI to transform complex systems into conversational partners—extends far beyond medicine. Any phenomenon that can be modeled can theoretically be given voice. But there’s a dangerous assumption embedded in this entire framework: that giving something a voice makes it more trustworthy, more comprehensible, more real.
Let me walk you through where conversational systems become transformative, where they become actively dangerous, and why we’re building the oracles first and planning to figure out the difference later.
Continue reading… “When Everything Speaks: Talking to Conspiracy Theories, Recessions, and Your Own Lack of Motivation”
