A new form of empire-building is underway, and your personal information is the territory
We are witnessing the emergence of a new form of colonialism—one that doesn’t require gunboats or territorial occupation, but instead harvests the most intimate resource of the 21st century: human data. While we debate traditional geopolitics, a silent war is raging for control over the digital essence of humanity itself.
The battleground is no longer geographic—it’s neurographic. AI companies aren’t just collecting data; they’re mapping the collective unconscious of our species, one interaction at a time.
The New Conquistadors
OpenAI, Google, and Perplexity are striking global partnerships to secure real-world data sets that can’t be scraped from the internet, creating what amounts to a systematic extraction economy. These aren’t benevolent partnerships—they’re sophisticated resource grabs disguised as technological progress.
Over the past two months, OpenAI has tied up with e-commerce majors Shopee and Shopify, while Google and Perplexity have doled out free access to their advanced AI tools to some users in India. The strategy is as old as colonialism itself: offer trinkets and conveniences to gain access to invaluable resources. Only this time, the resources aren’t gold or spices—they’re the patterns of human thought, desire, and behavior.
Consider the staggering scope of what’s at stake. China’s AI drug discovery companies have landed multibillion-dollar deals with pharmaceutical companies like AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Sanofi partly because they have access to health data from over 600 million people. This isn’t just about building better chatbots—it’s about achieving unprecedented insights into the human condition.
The Great Divide
The implications extend far beyond Silicon Valley boardrooms. If current development trends continue, it is expected that only 3 percent of the projected AI economic benefits will go to Latin America, 6 percent to developed countries in Asia (excluding China), and a mere 8 percent to the combined populations of “Africa, Oceania, and other Asian markets”. We’re engineering a future where 85% of AI’s $19.9 trillion economic benefit flows to just three regions: the United States, China, and Europe.
This isn’t accidentally inequitable—it’s systematically extractive. The global South provides the raw material (data) while the global North captures the value (intelligence). It’s the digital equivalent of shipping raw materials to the colonizer’s factories, then buying back the finished goods at premium prices.
Even as users lap up the benefits offered by AI giants, experts are concerned about issues such as data sovereignty and a trend where emerging markets become feeders into global AI systems without fair returns. The pattern is depressingly familiar: promise immediate benefits while establishing long-term dependence.
The Arsenal of Influence
The weaponization of data goes beyond mere business advantage. Future AI systems will ingest data streams we can barely imagine today—from quantum fluctuation monitoring to nano-scale fabric sensors embedded in our clothing, from dream interpretation streams to real-time emotional responses captured through affective computing.
These technologies will create what amounts to a total surveillance apparatus, not through government mandate but through consumer convenience. Your smart fabric will monitor your health, your neural dust will track your thoughts, and your personal biometric map will predict your needs before you’re conscious of them. All of this data flows upstream to the AI giants who control the infrastructure.
The most insidious aspect isn’t the collection—it’s the dependency. As these systems become more sophisticated, opting out becomes practically impossible. Try conducting modern business without Google search, cloud infrastructure, or mobile connectivity. Now imagine that level of dependency extending to healthcare decisions, financial planning, and even emotional wellbeing.
Digital Resistance Movements
Yet resistance is emerging. Countries are beginning to recognize the dual-use nature of GenAI. They acknowledge its potential as well as its risks, and the profound implications for their economic growth as well as national security. Nations from India to Indonesia are investing billions in sovereign AI capabilities, refusing to cede digital autonomy to foreign powers.
The UAE’s $11.56 billion investment in AI infrastructure by 2027 and India’s $1.25 billion IndiaAI Mission reflect a strategic pivot toward self-reliance, avoiding dependency on either bloc. These aren’t just technology investments—they’re declarations of digital independence.
Eighty-one percent of enterprise leaders believe an open source strategic data infrastructure is their future. The corporate world is waking up to the risks of technological colonization. Companies are realizing that surrendering their data to platform giants means surrendering their strategic autonomy.
The Coming Fragmentation
We’re heading toward a world of digital nation-states—separate AI ecosystems governed by incompatible values and controlled by different powers. The result is an increasingly fragmented global tech ecosystem. US allies in Europe and Asia find themselves pressured to choose sides or split their supply chains.
This fragmentation isn’t necessarily bad. It may be the only path to preserving human agency in an age of algorithmic control. When a handful of companies can influence elections, shape public opinion, and determine economic outcomes through their AI systems, fragmentation becomes a form of checks and balances.
The alternative—a unified global AI system controlled by a few mega-corporations—would represent the ultimate centralization of power in human history. Every decision, from what information you see to what opportunities you access, could be mediated by algorithms trained on data you provided for free.
Reclaiming the Commons
The path forward requires recognizing data for what it truly is: not a commodity to be harvested, but a commons to be stewarded. The patterns of human behavior, thought, and interaction belong to humanity collectively, not to whichever company manages to capture them first.
We need new models of data ownership that ensure the benefits of AI development flow to the communities that provide the training data. We need technological infrastructure that serves human flourishing rather than extracting human value. And we need governance frameworks that prevent the concentration of algorithmic power in the hands of a few.
The data wars are just beginning, and the stakes couldn’t be higher. At issue isn’t just economic advantage or technological leadership—it’s whether AI development serves human agency or undermines it, whether it amplifies human potential or replaces it, whether it creates shared prosperity or concentrated control.
The choices we make today about data governance, technological sovereignty, and algorithmic transparency will determine whether AI becomes humanity’s greatest tool or its most sophisticated form of subjugation. The colonizers are already at the gates, offering convenience in exchange for freedom. The question is whether we’ll recognize the bargain for what it really is—and choose differently while we still can.
Related Stories:
- AI Geopolitics Beyond the US-China Rivalry
- Sovereign AI: What it is, and 6 ways states are building it
