The Era of Separation: How AI Fractures Society Into Dozens of Distinct Tribes

By Futurist Thomas Frey

We’re entering what I call the Era of Separation—a period where AI, robotics, and automation don’t just change society but fracture it into dozens of distinct populations living fundamentally different lives.

This isn’t the traditional divide between rich and poor, educated and uneducated, or even digital natives versus digital immigrants. This is something more complex and more profound: an entire architecture of new social separations emerging simultaneously, each creating populations with incompatible experiences, capabilities, and worldviews.

By 2040, the question “How do you live?” will have dozens of valid answers that describe completely different realities.

The Replaced vs. The Displaced

Let’s start with the obvious separation: those whose jobs vanish versus those who get pushed aside.

The Replaced are people whose jobs disappear because AI does the same work better, faster, and cheaper. Customer service, data entry, basic coding, content writing, legal research—entire occupations simply cease to exist as AI handles them.

The Displaced are different. Their jobs still technically exist, but they’re pushed out by systems they can’t keep up with. Radiologists whose diagnoses get overruled by AI. Architects whose designs are rejected in favor of AI-optimized plans. Middle managers whose decision-making authority gets transferred to algorithms.

The replaced lose tasks. The displaced lose relevance. And these two groups will respond very differently—politically, socially, and economically.

Tool Users vs. Tool Builders

AI gives everyone superpowers—but only if they learn to use it effectively.

Tool Users adapt quickly, becoming “centaurs” who multiply their capabilities by combining human judgment with AI execution. They use AI to write, design, analyze, and create at scales impossible alone.

Tool Builders create the AI systems themselves. This group becomes the new elite—the handful who actually understand how the systems work and can shape them. Everyone else becomes dependent on tools someone else controls.

The gap isn’t just income. It’s structural leverage. Tool builders own the means of intelligence production. Tool users rent access. Everyone else gets left behind entirely.

Agency Amplifiers vs. Agency Atrophiers

Here’s where it gets psychologically interesting. AI can either make you more capable or make you helpless—and the outcome depends entirely on how you use it.

Agency Amplifiers use AI to become superhuman—offloading tedious work while maintaining skills, judgment, and decision-making capacity. They learn more because AI tutors them. They accomplish more because AI handles execution. They remain competent humans with AI assistance.

Agency Atrophiers outsource everything—thinking, planning, remembering, deciding—until their skills atrophy completely. They can’t navigate without GPS. They can’t write without AI. They can’t make decisions without algorithmic recommendations. They become helpless when systems fail.

This creates a cognitive divide as significant as literacy. Some people maintain agency augmented by AI. Others surrender agency to AI and lose the capacity to function independently.

Entrepreneurs vs. Operators

The entrepreneur versus working-class divide becomes sharper and more structural.

Entrepreneurs gain unprecedented leverage from AI—starting businesses with one person, one laptop, and armies of AI agents handling everything from marketing to customer service to product development. The barrier to entrepreneurship collapses.

Operators become task-executors using AI systems someone else owns. They follow instructions, manage exceptions, and handle edge cases the AI can’t. They’re employed, but they have no structural leverage and no path to ownership.

The gap isn’t just wealth. It’s power, autonomy, and the fundamental relationship to economic systems.

Analog Loyalists vs. Autonomous Natives

Baby Boomers versus Gen Z is old thinking. The new divide cuts across generations:

Analog Loyalists prefer manual processes, in-person interactions, and human-to-human systems. They drive cars manually, shop in physical stores, and resist automation out of preference or principle.

Autonomous Natives consider conversational AI agents, self-driving transportation, and automated infrastructure completely normal. They can’t imagine life without it and find manual processes inefficient and frustrating.

Entire consumer markets will split along this line—housing, transportation, healthcare, entertainment. Cities will develop distinct neighborhoods catering to each population with incompatible infrastructure.

The Augmented vs. The Non-Augmented

People who use wearables, health sensors, neural interfaces, AI copilots, and predictive personal agents will experience a different baseline of intelligence, health, and capability than people who avoid augmentation.

The Augmented have continuous health monitoring, cognitive enhancement through AI, and predictive systems preventing problems before they occur. They live longer, perform better, and access opportunities unavailable to unaugmented humans.

The Non-Augmented resist surveillance, maintain privacy, and preserve unmediated experience. They’re healthier than previous generations but dramatically disadvantaged compared to augmented peers.

This becomes the new digital divide—not access to technology but willingness to integrate it into your body and life.

Presence Workers vs. Remote-First Workers

AI makes remote work more powerful while simultaneously making physical presence more valuable in specific domains.

Presence Workers do caregiving, construction, hospitality, robot maintenance—work requiring physical location. They’re geographically tethered, living where work exists.

Remote-First Workers are geographically unbound, working from anywhere with internet. They form global communities untethered to physical location.

These populations drift into different cities, different cultures, and different political priorities. They stop having overlapping interests or shared experiences.

Data-Rich vs. Data-Invisible

Your personal AI agents can optimize your life only if they observe everything about you.

Data-Rich people allow full tracking—sleep, biometrics, spending, movement, conversations. They trade privacy for optimization and receive dramatically better health outcomes, financial advice, and life recommendations.

Data-Invisible people resist surveillance and stay off-grid. They maintain privacy but lose access to personalized systems. Doctors can’t help them as effectively. Financial systems treat them as higher risk. Opportunities that require data-driven recommendations pass them by.

This divide impacts health, education, finance, law enforcement, and employment. The data-invisible become second-class citizens in a system optimized for the data-rich.

Robot-Integrated vs. Manual Homes

A massive lifestyle separation emerges:

Robot-Integrated Homes have autonomous kitchens, cleaning swarms, laundry bots, and daily AI coordination handling all household labor. Residents never clean, never cook unless they choose to, and have hours of daily time freed up.

Manual Homes remain unautomated by choice or necessity. Residents handle all household tasks themselves, the way humans always have.

This becomes a status divide like broadband access twenty years ago. The robot-integrated have radically more free time. The manual homeowners remain trapped in domestic labor that the wealthy have automated away.

Creators vs. Reactors

AI turns everyone into a potential publisher, producer, inventor, or storyteller. But most people won’t create anything.

Creators use AI to spawn continuous output—writing, designing, building, sharing. They become prolific because AI handles execution while they provide direction and judgment.

Reactors consume endlessly—scrolling through AI-generated media streams, watching content others created, never producing anything themselves. They’re entertained but passive, living through others’ creations.

This becomes a cultural and economic divide. Creators capture attention and generate income. Reactors pay for access and remain economically marginal.

The Compounding Effect

Here’s what makes the Era of Separation so profound: these divides compound, overlap, and amplify each other.

Someone who’s augmented, data-rich, living in a robot-integrated home, working remotely as an entrepreneur, and actively creating will have a radically different life than someone who’s non-augmented, data-invisible, living manually, working as a presence operator, and passively consuming.

They won’t just have different incomes. They’ll have different capabilities, health outcomes, lifespans, opportunities, and worldviews. They’ll barely be able to comprehend each other’s lives.

And crucially, there’s no single divide. There are dozens of separation axes, creating not two groups but hundreds of micro-populations forming around how individuals integrate or reject automation, AI, robotics, and augmentation.

What This Means

By 2040, “How do you live?” won’t have one answer or even two. It’ll have dozens—each describing a distinct tribe with its own norms, capabilities, limitations, and futures.

Society isn’t dividing into haves and have-nots. It’s fragmenting into an archipelago of populations with fundamentally incompatible experiences, unable to understand each other’s lives and increasingly unable to share common institutions or governance.

This is the Era of Separation. And we’re just beginning to experience its consequences.

Related Stories: