For nearly sixty years, humanity has gazed skyward with a burning desire to escape the confines of our planet, much like a person yearning to break free from an indoor space. Despite nearly 60 years of the space age, only a handful of astronauts have been fortunate enough to venture beyond Earth’s atmosphere. The balcony of our world, known as low Earth orbit, has been graced by a mere few hundred astronauts, while an even smaller group, a mere thirty individuals, have touched the surface of our celestial house-garden – the Moon. Among this elite group, a mere dozen have had the privilege of walking upon its ancient surface.

While a few unmanned spacecraft have managed to journey to our neighboring planets – Mars, Venus, Jupiter, and Saturn – only three have embarked on longer voyages into the cosmos. The Voyager spacecraft, launched in the late 1970s, now reside on the fringes of our solar system. In 2015, the New Horizons spacecraft provided humanity with unprecedented images of Pluto, and in the current decade, it may even venture to the edge of our solar system. Yet, the grandeur of our solar system pales in comparison to the vast expanse of the cosmic tapestry that stretches across the universe.

Within our galaxy, the Milky Way, a staggering 200 billion suns are scattered, many accompanied by their own retinue of planets. And beyond our galaxy, estimates suggest that a hundred billion more galaxies dance in the cosmic sea. These numbers defy easy comprehension; the Milky Way’s diameter alone spans about one hundred thousand light-years. To put this in perspective, traversing this vast distance at the speed of light would consume a staggering 100,000 years.

Our closest stellar neighbor, Proxima Centauri, resides 4.25 light-years away. Even if we could travel at the speed of light, the journey to Proxima Centauri and its potentially Earth-like planet would take over four years. Yet, our current spacecraft are far from reaching such speeds. Take, for instance, the New Horizons spacecraft, hurtling through space at over a million kilometers per day. Even at this astonishing pace, a journey to Proxima Centauri would span around 70 thousand years.

Is it possible for humanity to come close to the speed of light? Can we truly venture to other star systems? These questions extend beyond mere curiosity; they could hold the key to our survival. While Earth’s lifespan is finite – its end predicted in about 5 billion years as the sun expands and engulfs it – more immediate threats, like asteroid collisions or human-made disasters, might compel us to seek refuge elsewhere.

Recent decades have seen the emergence of innovative technologies that could revolutionize space exploration and shatter the boundaries that currently confine us. Some of these ideas remain within the realm of imagination, while others are inching closer to the realm of possibility. Back in 1928, British physicist Paul Dirac predicted the existence of a mysterious particle – the anti-electron. This particle, also known as a positron, possesses the same properties as an electron but carries a positive charge. Subsequent years confirmed that such anti-particles are not mere theoretical constructs; they are real entities. Even anti-protons, capable of forming complete antimatter atoms, have emerged.

When matter meets its antimatter counterpart, mutual annihilation occurs, releasing a prodigious amount of energy. This energy could potentially propel spacecraft at incredible speeds. Just a few milligrams of positrons could potentially shorten a trip to Mars from months to mere weeks. However, the challenge lies in obtaining sufficient quantities of antimatter. Despite advances, antimatter remains one of the world’s most expensive substances, priced in the trillions of dollars per gram. Producing it demands enormous energy, curbing widespread interest. For antimatter engines to become practical, we must discover more efficient methods of production or find ways to harvest antimatter in space.

Another propulsion concept involves harnessing nuclear energy. Modern spacecraft already use nuclear generators to power their instruments during extended missions beyond the reach of solar energy. While these generators lack the thrust required for propulsion, theories of nuclear-explosion-powered spacecraft emerged in the mid-20th century. These spacecraft would use controlled nuclear detonations for propulsion, potentially attaining speeds up to a tenth of the speed of light.

However, practical and safety concerns have kept these ideas grounded. A fusion reactor, on the other hand, offers promise. Nuclear fusion, the process that powers the sun, involves merging small atoms like hydrogen into larger ones, releasing enormous energy. Unlike nuclear fission, which powers atomic bombs, fusion doesn’t generate harmful radioactive byproducts. If we can devise a way to collect hydrogen atoms in space and funnel them into a fusion engine, the resulting propulsion could sustain high-velocity journeys.

Prominent physicist Michio Kaku suggested a concept called the ramjet engine, which could theoretically accelerate a spacecraft at a constant rate of 1g, similar to Earth’s gravity. A year-long journey under such acceleration could push the craft to 77% of the speed of light, making interstellar travel a genuine possibility. According to Einstein’s theory of relativity, time dilation would occur at such speeds, potentially allowing crew members to traverse the entire observable universe within their lifetimes, while billions of years transpire outside.

While this idea is tantalizing, the primary challenge remains the efficient construction of a hydrogen fusion reactor that produces more energy than it consumes. Until this hurdle is overcome, the dream of limitless space travel aboard colossal spacecraft will remain just that – a dream. Nonetheless, as humanity’s thirst for exploration knows no bounds, these ideas continue to inspire us to reach for the stars.

By Impact Lab